Could Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, be involved in a gigantic cover-up? If so, he's going down... and not just in the eyes of the voter.
TheBigRetort has uncovered evidence which may suggest that the recent furore over the new identity of Jon Venables may be designed solely to conceal the possibility that he has ALREADY been convicted. of a serious offence involving children long before it was announced.
Just think it through for a minute....
Venables is amongst one of four people in Britain protected by what are termed ‘Mary Bell’ injunctions.
Bell was convicted of the manslaughter of two boys in 1968 and given anonymity after her release.
The recipients receive lifetime protection of their real identities.
It was recently reported in the Daily Mail that a ‘tight-knit group alone knows the new identity of Jon Venables. It operates in a culture of ‘extreme secrecy’, so even the arresting officers may not have known who they had in their cells. However, theBigRetort believes that fears that the recall could see Venables’ new identity being discovered and his life threatened because of fellow prisoners' suspicions about special treatment, is purely a smokescreen – designed to assist the Government in a gigantic cover-up.
What if Jon Venables has in fact ALREADY been tried and convicted under his new alias? What if he was ALREADY languishing inside a British prison when he was in fact ‘recalled under licence’ by a Justice Minister eager to catch up with a forgotten man?
Thought police aside, as our old mother would say, if true... it is quite an elaborate charade.
Could it be that Justice Minister Jack Straw, along with the Prime Minister Gordon Brown, hopes that a smokescreen of excessive secrecy surrounding the ‘recent arrest’ will buy the Labour government time?
Once it discovered Venables conviction (not arrest) it must have quickly moved to close down the ever watchful media.
If the serious allegations against Mr Venables can be dealt with AFTER a General Election it is highly likely that a voter backlash can be avoided, and Labour may be left to increase the secrecy once more.
Be that as it may (or may not) be...
It is likely that, if an arrest and conviction did take place - long before the Government announcement - the Government itself may not have known until after the new conviction was sealed: due to the excessive secrecy the Government imposed on Venables' new identity in the first place.
Confused?... you should be.
This would indicate serious failings within the probation service itself and with the government’s obsession in doling out new identities to violent offenders in search of a new life.
But, is it an obsession which allows Government to hoodwink the British public and justice too?
The questions that must be answered before a General Election...
Venables was already in prison LONG before he was recalled under licence… but why?
Why?
Coming soon in theBigRetort... secrets, lies, and spin.
TheBigRetort has uncovered evidence which may suggest that the recent furore over the new identity of Jon Venables may be designed solely to conceal the possibility that he has ALREADY been convicted. of a serious offence involving children long before it was announced.
Just think it through for a minute....
Venables is amongst one of four people in Britain protected by what are termed ‘Mary Bell’ injunctions.
Bell was convicted of the manslaughter of two boys in 1968 and given anonymity after her release.
The recipients receive lifetime protection of their real identities.
It was recently reported in the Daily Mail that a ‘tight-knit group alone knows the new identity of Jon Venables. It operates in a culture of ‘extreme secrecy’, so even the arresting officers may not have known who they had in their cells. However, theBigRetort believes that fears that the recall could see Venables’ new identity being discovered and his life threatened because of fellow prisoners' suspicions about special treatment, is purely a smokescreen – designed to assist the Government in a gigantic cover-up.
What if Jon Venables has in fact ALREADY been tried and convicted under his new alias? What if he was ALREADY languishing inside a British prison when he was in fact ‘recalled under licence’ by a Justice Minister eager to catch up with a forgotten man?
Thought police aside, as our old mother would say, if true... it is quite an elaborate charade.
Could it be that Justice Minister Jack Straw, along with the Prime Minister Gordon Brown, hopes that a smokescreen of excessive secrecy surrounding the ‘recent arrest’ will buy the Labour government time?
Once it discovered Venables conviction (not arrest) it must have quickly moved to close down the ever watchful media.
If the serious allegations against Mr Venables can be dealt with AFTER a General Election it is highly likely that a voter backlash can be avoided, and Labour may be left to increase the secrecy once more.
Be that as it may (or may not) be...
It is likely that, if an arrest and conviction did take place - long before the Government announcement - the Government itself may not have known until after the new conviction was sealed: due to the excessive secrecy the Government imposed on Venables' new identity in the first place.
Confused?... you should be.
This would indicate serious failings within the probation service itself and with the government’s obsession in doling out new identities to violent offenders in search of a new life.
But, is it an obsession which allows Government to hoodwink the British public and justice too?
The questions that must be answered before a General Election...
Venables was already in prison LONG before he was recalled under licence… but why?
Why?
Coming soon in theBigRetort... secrets, lies, and spin.
Comments
Post a Comment