THE BIG
RETORT SPECIAL REPORT
A Borough without a conscience
Since
2020, two British citizens — Ahmet and Şahin Gök of Meze Mangal — have lived
under the shadow of a law never meant for them. Their “crime”? Installing a
kitchen extractor in response to a neighbour’s complaint. Their punishment?
Criminal prosecution, confiscation proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act
(POCA), and the seizure of their passports by Lewisham Council lawyers.
This is
not regulation. It is retribution. It is “making an example.”
Lewisham
Council, acting through its out-housed solicitors Browne Jacobson and its
barrister Philip Vollans of No. 5 Chambers, has turned a planning dispute into
a criminal trial. The council did so while telling magistrates that POCA
escalation was “mandatory” — a statement that was, and remains, false. The
matter could have been dealt with at magistrates’ court, AND an unlimited fine
charged. But Lewisham would not have received over 37% of the take. That’s
POCA.
The
brothers have been branded offenders so the council can chase a £2.5 million
“confiscation” payout — money that, if secured, goes not to victims, but into
the council’s own accounts. Offers of paying smaller amounts of such a large
bounty fall on deaf ears.
Yesterday at Woolwich Crown Court, a small measure of justice surfaced. But concerns for The Big Retort remain. Here’s why.
Court
Report: The Gök Brothers – Hearing of 22 October 2025
Judge:
Her Honour Judge Charlotte Walsh (appointed a Circuit Judge by King Charles in
2003)
Prosecution: Mr Philip Vollans (No. 5 Chambers), instructed by Browne Jacobson
LLP
Defence: Mr Quentin Hunt
The
hearing commenced at 3:22 p.m. The prosecutor, Mr Vollans, appeared via video
link — as per usual — fully robed. He confirmed he continued to act on
instructions from Lewisham Council, via the out-housed legal firm Browne
Jacobson (a name to remember).
The
Turkish interpreter was sworn. Then, remarkably, the defendants, Ahmet and
Şahin Gök, were escorted into a glass holding pen, flanked by a security
officer and the interpreter. They seemed confused. The door was then locked.
From the press gallery, they appeared small and diminished — their heads barely
visible above the glass partitions as they sat.
The judge
asked them to stand and confirm their identities, which they did through the
interpreter. She remarked that she was “mindful not to waste people’s money if
I don’t need to,” noting that the case had already dragged on far too long and
costs had escalated.
Defence
counsel Mr Hunt confirmed that there was no deal on the table (really?) and
that the case would therefore proceed to a full trial in March 2026. He
explained that earlier delays had been due to the brothers caring for their
terminally ill father, now deceased, and that their cooperation since had been
exemplary. The judge agreed, noting “a real improvement.”
Mr Hunt
drew the court’s attention to the ongoing hardship caused by the passport
seizure — imposed by Lewisham Council — which had prevented the brothers from
attending family funerals in Turkey. He pressed for their permanent return,
stressing that they were not flight risks, were in receipt of publicly verified
legal funds (via GoFundMe contributors ring-fenced by The Big Retort), and had
demonstrated integrity throughout.
The judge
appeared moved. “They can be trusted to attend court,” she said, ordering that
the passports be returned unconditionally and the defendants released on
unconditional bail.
Mr
Vollans, for the Council, raised no objection. Though it must be said that the
passports were seized not by the judge’s request.
Addressing
the brothers directly, Judge Welsh said:
“Messrs Gök — you’ve been very cooperative. I’m happy to release you on
unconditional bail. You are free to come and go to Turkey as and when you
wish.”
The
brothers were released shortly thereafter from the glass holding pen — like
battery hens.
The case
is listed for full hearing on 19 March 2026.
Of
course, we applaud the return of their passports. But the return, after so much
heartache for the pair and the community they have served for decades, should
not be treated as a triumph. It is a restoration of what should never have taken
place. Two restaurateurs, treated as criminals for installing a fan, have
endured humiliation, fear, and ruin at the hands of their own local authority.
£2.5
million pounds is the plunder for the POCA hunters.
The
injustice continues.
The Big
Retort
Editor’s
Note:
As revealed in our earlier investigations, Lewisham Council’s own counsel told
magistrates that escalation under the Proceeds of Crime Act was “mandatory”
under Section 70 — a claim now proven false. The Act gives discretion, not
obligation. That legal fiction set in motion the criminalisation of two local
business owners and the destruction of their hard-working lives.
The Big
Retort will continue to pursue this story until accountability reaches those at
the top — including Mayor Brenda Dacres and the officers who signed off this
abuse of process. We call them The Poca Hunters. And they are soon to be outed.
The Big Retort


Comments
Post a Comment