Skip to main content

The Galileo Factor: Avi, Atlas and Aliens

 


The history of science is littered with innovators scorned by the establishment, yet few comparisons are as potent today as that between Avi Loeb and Galileo Galilei. Both—separated by four centuries—stand accused of practising "bad science" because they prioritise the interpretation of new
anomalous observations over allegiance to the reigning theoretical dogma... The Big Retort

The Case of Loeb: Dogma versus the Null Hypothesis

Today, the established astronomical dogma means everything must be explained by known physics and chemistry before anyone dare mention an advanced intelligence greater than ours. This is enforced by the principle of Occam's Razor (the simplest explanation is usually the correct one).

Avi Loeb's "crime" is the suggestion that 'Oumuamua and 3I/ATLAS could be extraterrestrial technological artefacts (ETAs). Avi doesn't assert proof, but argues that these anomalies are so difficult to explain naturally that the ETA hypothesis should be a primary target for falsifiable scientific pursuit. In other words, Avi thinks outside the box. What’s not to like?

Well, if you are a heavily PH.D'd scientist and you’re part of that same club that might have convicted Galileo, get ready for light-speed expulsion, Avi. The community's rejection stems from a belief that the claim is an unnecessary assumption and an Earth-centric distraction. Yet, the anomalies persist. Here are a few from the current tally:

  • The Trajectory Problem: The orbit of 3I/ATLAS is aligned with the ecliptic plane (the flat plane where the planets orbit) within five degrees, a coincidence with a statistical likelihood of only 0.2% for a random interstellar object. It also makes unusually close passes to Mars, Venus, and Jupiter.
  • The Shape Anomaly: 'Oumuamua's brightness variation suggested an extreme geometry, being at least five to ten times longer than it is wide—more extreme than any known solar system object.
  • The Water-Poor Plume: The gas plume of 3I/ATLAS contains only 4% water by mass, far less than the primary constituent of familiar comets.
  • The Nickel Puzzle: 3I/ATLAS displayed an anomalous composition of nickel vapour without the corresponding iron typically found in comets. While this could be natural "galactic cooking" it is also perfectly consistent with an engineered, radiation-hardened nickel alloy.
  • The Extreme Polarisation: 3I/ATLAS shows extreme negative light polarisation, a trait unprecedented among all known comets and asteroids, suggesting an unusual, possibly non-icy surface.
  • The Non-Gravitational Push (Oumuamua): 'Oumuamua accelerated away from the sun without showing the coma or tail (outgassing) that would provide the necessary thrust. Avi Loeb and his colleagues suggested this could be due to pressure from sunlight acting on a thin, wide structure—a light sail.
  • The Jet Anomaly: 3I/ATLAS was observed with a sunward jet (an anti-tail) that did not appear to be the optical illusion seen in other comets, defying standard outgassing models.
  • The Mass/Velocity Disparity: 3I/ATLAS is estimated to be highly massive (millions of times more massive than 'Oumuamua) but still moves exceptionally fast at 58 km/s. If its acceleration is from outgassing, it would require a massive loss of material that has not been consistently observed.
  • The Velocity Anomaly: The speeds of both objects are problematic. 3I/ATLAS arrived at 58 km/s, and 'Oumuamua at 26 km/s. If launched recently in response to our radio signals, these low speeds require an impossible journey. However, it is this investigation's contention that both speeds are, in fact, optimal velocities for a multi-stage, passive reconnaissance mission, achieved via an initial, external braking event.
  • The 'Wow!' Coincidence: This investigation posits that the powerful, technological braking system required to slow the probes down to their entry speeds could be the source of the famous 1977 Wow! Signal. Oumuamua's non-gravitational acceleration, in particular, could represent the final, high-speed 'light-sail' braking component deployed during or immediately after this primary Wow! event, which occurred near the calculated position of 3I/ATLAS.

The Core Philosophical Conflict

While Galileo offered proof that contradicted the old model, Loeb offers anomalies that cannot be easily reconciled with the current model. The parallel lies not in the evidence, but in the resistance to intellectual flexibility when faced with potential discovery.

The establishment risks making the same historical mistake: prioritising the defence of the current scientific method over the courage to pursue the most intriguing possibility suggested by the data. The "Galileo factor" in Loeb's story is the warning that the most difficult discovery is not finding the evidence, but getting the authorities to accept its implications—even if those implications involve the A-Words: Atlas, Aliens, and Avi Loeb.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

James O'Brien: LBC presenter secret buy-to-let millionaire - Exclusive update

The Ayatollah of the Airwaves, James O’Brien, is still raging at the radio ether. His current demons: pensioner investors and... buy-to-let. “It’s not the politics of envy to say they need their wings clipped,” he declared last week. In fact, if you hit the numbers and can’t get through it’s probably because he’s still banging on about landlords and second-home ownership.    Time to take a peek then at the former landlord-turned-gamekeeper’s own dirty “deeds“.  A BIGRETORT EXCLUSIVE In 2014 AD, the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby held a head-to-head with presenter James O’Brien; who isn’t usually lost for words let's face it. But whilst His Grace fielded phone-calls from LBC devotees, sat at the other end of the wireless alongside him was not the station's usual attack dog -  instead, in somewhat subdued genuflection, was old motor mouth himself. Choirboy O'Brie...

Lewisham Council POCA Prosecution: Job Ad Reveals Mandate To 'Maximise Income'

From Borough of Sanctuary to dystopian world — Lewisham Council places landmark restaurant on the POCA grill.  THE BIG RETORT… Some days, when I pass the grimy windows at Laurence House in Catford, I swear I can hear the sound of someone desperately singing from the floors above: “You’ve gotta pick a POCA or two, boys…” Lewisham once styled itself a Borough of Sanctuary. But today it feels more like a borough for bounty hunters — where local businesses and good neighbours aren’t nurtured, but criminalised for profit. The game is called POCA . In plain English, the Proceeds of Crime Act  works like this: after a criminal conviction is secured, a prosecuting authority can ask the court to treat unexplained money or assets as “criminal benefit” unless proved otherwise.  The trawl through the person’s past can prove costly, both mentally and financially, as it stretches back six years from when proceedings commence .  The court then sets a “benefit” figure and an amount ...

Convicted: How Councils prosecute for profit

What’s happening in Labour-run Lewisham today has left me thinking. I once believed in the ideals of the Labour party: justice, fairness, and accountability – but, not now. These are just the empty sloganeering of an elite few in Lewisham's town hall and Parliament. In truth, Lewisham is not a borough of sanctuary but a place for Pocaneering . Ordinary residents—entrepreneurs, good Samaritans, and hardworking immigrants—are being treated not as part of the community, but as financial targets . All in the name of planning enforcement. All under the guise of legality. And all tied to the toxic incentives of the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) . The sand and cement storefront scandal – Criminalised Let’s begin with local DIY shop owner Kevin Bottomley, reported here under KJ Building Supplies and our successful campaign Save KJs. He was selling small quantities of sand and cement from his shop's driveway – the kind of side hustle long part of Lewisham life, helping neighbours avo...