The history of science is littered with innovators scorned by the establishment, yet few comparisons are as potent today as that between Avi Loeb and Galileo Galilei. Both—separated by four centuries—stand accused of practising "bad science" because they prioritise the interpretation of new anomalous observations over allegiance to the reigning theoretical dogma... The Big Retort
The Case of Loeb: Dogma versus the Null Hypothesis
Today,
the established astronomical dogma means everything must be explained by known
physics and chemistry before anyone dare mention an advanced intelligence
greater than ours. This is enforced by the principle of Occam's Razor (the simplest explanation is usually the correct
one).
Avi
Loeb's "crime" is the suggestion that 'Oumuamua and 3I/ATLAS could be
extraterrestrial technological
artefacts (ETAs). Avi doesn't assert proof, but argues that these
anomalies are so difficult to explain naturally that the ETA hypothesis should
be a primary target for falsifiable scientific pursuit. In other words, Avi
thinks outside the box. What’s not to like?
Well, if
you are a heavily PH.D'd scientist and you’re part of that same club that might
have convicted Galileo, get ready for light-speed expulsion, Avi. The
community's rejection stems from a belief that the claim is an unnecessary
assumption and an Earth-centric distraction. Yet, the anomalies persist. Here
are a few from the current tally:
- The Trajectory Problem: The
orbit of 3I/ATLAS is aligned with the ecliptic plane (the flat plane where
the planets orbit) within five degrees, a coincidence with a statistical
likelihood of only 0.2% for a random interstellar object. It also makes
unusually close passes to Mars, Venus, and Jupiter.
- The Shape Anomaly:
'Oumuamua's brightness variation suggested an extreme geometry, being at
least five to ten times longer than it is wide—more extreme than any known
solar system object.
- The Water-Poor Plume: The
gas plume of 3I/ATLAS contains only 4% water by mass, far less than the
primary constituent of familiar comets.
- The Nickel Puzzle: 3I/ATLAS
displayed an anomalous composition of nickel vapour without the
corresponding iron typically found in comets. While this could be natural
"galactic cooking" it is also perfectly consistent with an engineered, radiation-hardened nickel
alloy.
- The Extreme Polarisation:
3I/ATLAS shows extreme negative light polarisation, a trait unprecedented
among all known comets and asteroids, suggesting an unusual, possibly
non-icy surface.
- The Non-Gravitational Push
(Oumuamua): 'Oumuamua accelerated away from the sun without showing the
coma or tail (outgassing) that would provide the necessary thrust. Avi
Loeb and his colleagues suggested this could be due to pressure from
sunlight acting on a thin, wide structure—a light sail.
- The Jet Anomaly: 3I/ATLAS
was observed with a sunward jet
(an anti-tail) that did not appear to be the optical illusion seen in
other comets, defying standard outgassing models.
- The Mass/Velocity Disparity:
3I/ATLAS is estimated to be highly massive (millions of times more massive
than 'Oumuamua) but still moves exceptionally fast at 58 km/s. If its
acceleration is from outgassing, it would require a massive loss of
material that has not been consistently observed.
- The Velocity Anomaly: The
speeds of both objects are problematic. 3I/ATLAS arrived at 58 km/s, and
'Oumuamua at 26 km/s. If launched recently in response to our radio
signals, these low speeds require an impossible journey. However, it is this investigation's
contention that both speeds are, in fact, optimal velocities for a
multi-stage, passive reconnaissance mission, achieved via an initial,
external braking event.
- The 'Wow!' Coincidence: This
investigation posits that the powerful, technological braking system
required to slow the probes down to their entry speeds could be the source
of the famous 1977 Wow! Signal. Oumuamua's
non-gravitational acceleration, in particular, could represent the final,
high-speed 'light-sail' braking component deployed during or immediately
after this primary Wow! event, which occurred near the calculated
position of 3I/ATLAS.
The Core Philosophical Conflict
While
Galileo offered proof that contradicted the old model, Loeb offers anomalies
that cannot be easily reconciled with the current model. The parallel lies not
in the evidence, but in the resistance to intellectual flexibility when faced
with potential discovery.
The
establishment risks making the same historical mistake: prioritising the
defence of the current scientific method over the courage to pursue the most
intriguing possibility suggested by the data. The "Galileo factor" in
Loeb's story is the warning that the most difficult discovery is not finding
the evidence, but getting the authorities to accept its implications—even if those implications involve the
A-Words: Atlas, Aliens, and Avi Loeb.


Comments
Post a Comment