Skip to main content

"Behind Closed Muffs: When reputation trumped the dock"

In a fascinating historical account from the "Saint James's Chronicle" newspaper, dated December 20, 1842, we transport you back to a different era. We delve into an incident that unfolded within the revered halls of the Marlborough Street Magistrates' Court in London, England. A Prisoner's Refusal to Enter the Dock for Sentencing: TheBigRetort...

One hundred and eighty-one years ago, Anne Maria Fenton, (not pictured), a woman said to possess a substantial fortune, found herself thrust into the spotlight due to an unfortunate circumstance.  Her story presents a captivating exploration of a woman's fashion sense and the intricate dance between public image and the legal consequences of her refusal to enter the dock for sentencing. Faced with the seemingly mundane charge of being "very drunk and incapable" in the early hours of the morning.

What might have appeared to be a straightforward case, the unfolding events within the courtroom took an unexpected turn and led to greater reporting. Anne Maria's arrival was marked by her determination not to leave her private cabriolet unless compelled. Dressed impeccably, she eventually entered the courtroom with an aura of exclusivity.

Yet her reluctance to subject herself to public scrutiny was palpable. Anne Maria adamantly declined to step into the dock, displaying an aversion to being exposed to the gaze of curious onlookers.

After persistent efforts, Anne Maria finally stood at the bar—her face hidden behind a muff. Not that one, but a popular furry fashion accessory of the time into which a lady’s hands were placed for warmth. This deliberate act of concealment mirrored her desire to evade the inevitable spotlight that accompanies a courtroom appearance.

The narrative takes an unforeseen twist as Police-constable Allen, bearing badge number 154A, offers testimony regarding the charges against Madame Fenton.

At this juncture, the magistrate, Mr. Maltby, steps in to deliver judgment. With practicality in mind, he proposes a fine for Anne Maria's state of inebriation.

However, her companion intervenes. A fashionable mercer from Regent Street, he suggests an alternative: contributing to the poor-box. This alternative option's motivation is clear—to shield the defendant from the unyielding glare of public notoriety that a published fine might bring.

However, Mr. Maltby remains resolute in his decision, imposing a fine of 5 shillings upon Anne Maria for her intoxicated state.

This conclusion encapsulates the intricate interplay between legal procedures, societal norms, and the immense value placed on reputation in an era where appearances held paramount importance—especially for those refusing to enter the conspicuous dock. Made all the more so by their refusal to enter it.

In a world where legal proceedings intermingled with social standing and the preservation of one’s image, this 1842 account offers a captivating glimpse seen in the present. Anne Maria's steadfast refusal to step into the dock, her visage concealed behind her muff, and the delicate dance around public perception, all stand as a testament to the enduring theme of reputation management—a theme as relevant in the 19th century as it is during the modern-day sentencing. 

 Copyright (c) TheBigRetort


 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

James O'Brien: LBC presenter secret buy-to-let millionaire - Exclusive update

The Ayatollah of the Airwaves, James O’Brien, is still raging at the radio ether. His current demons: pensioner investors and... buy-to-let. “It’s not the politics of envy to say they need their wings clipped,” he declared last week. In fact, if you hit the numbers and can’t get through it’s probably because he’s still banging on about landlords and second-home ownership.    Time to take a peek then at the former landlord-turned-gamekeeper’s own dirty “deeds“.  A BIGRETORT EXCLUSIVE In 2014 AD, the Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby held a head-to-head with presenter James O’Brien; who isn’t usually lost for words let's face it. But whilst His Grace fielded phone-calls from LBC devotees, sat at the other end of the wireless alongside him was not the station's usual attack dog -  instead, in somewhat subdued genuflection, was old motor mouth himself. Choirboy O'Brie...
23 comments
Read more

Lewisham Council POCA Prosecution: Job Ad Reveals Mandate To 'Maximise Income'

From Borough of Sanctuary to dystopian world — Lewisham Council places landmark restaurant on the POCA grill.  THE BIG RETORT… Some days, when I pass the grimy windows at Laurence House in Catford, I swear I can hear the sound of someone desperately singing from the floors above: “You’ve gotta pick a POCA or two, boys…” Lewisham once styled itself a Borough of Sanctuary. But today it feels more like a borough for bounty hunters — where local businesses and good neighbours aren’t nurtured, but criminalised for profit. The game is called POCA . In plain English, the Proceeds of Crime Act  works like this: after a criminal conviction is secured, a prosecuting authority can ask the court to treat unexplained money or assets as “criminal benefit” unless proved otherwise.  The trawl through the person’s past can prove costly, both mentally and financially, as it stretches back six years from when proceedings commence .  The court then sets a “benefit” figure and an amount ...
8 comments
Read more

Convicted: How Councils prosecute for profit

What’s happening in Labour-run Lewisham today has left me thinking. I once believed in the ideals of the Labour party: justice, fairness, and accountability – but, not now. These are just the empty sloganeering of an elite few in Lewisham's town hall and Parliament. In truth, Lewisham is not a borough of sanctuary but a place for Pocaneering . Ordinary residents—entrepreneurs, good Samaritans, and hardworking immigrants—are being treated not as part of the community, but as financial targets . All in the name of planning enforcement. All under the guise of legality. And all tied to the toxic incentives of the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA) . The sand and cement storefront scandal – Criminalised Let’s begin with local DIY shop owner Kevin Bottomley, reported here under KJ Building Supplies and our successful campaign Save KJs. He was selling small quantities of sand and cement from his shop's driveway – the kind of side hustle long part of Lewisham life, helping neighbours avo...
Post a Comment
Read more